Connecticut Firearm Law Loophole

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

Gun store owners are taking advantage of a supposed loophole in Connecticut’s firearms legislation by selling pre-1994 manufactured “assault weapons.”

Last week, Fox Connecticut uncovered an exemption in the gun bill which allows citizens to buy, sell, or transfer any semi-automatic rifles made prior to 1994. Those firearms were put back on the market after President Clinton’s assault weapons ban expired in 2004.

“If you can prove that they were manufactured before 1994 they are not affected by this law,” Undersecretary for Criminal Justice in the Office of Policy and Management Mike Lawlor said.

Firearms dealers have begun using the exemption, by purchasing what are called “pre-bans” from out of state and selling them off Connecticut shelves. Tactical Arms in Torrington has sold 11 pre-bans already. A shipment of 26 or more are due next week. Two other gun stores told Fox Connecticut that they have only one pre-ban left to sell.

There is also a thriving demand for the guns on the internet where potential sellers can advertise the firearms to interested buyers in Connecticut. One person wrote on the forum , “This may be your LAST CHANCE to get a PRE-BAN rifle” and “They are selling around here for $4,000 to $4,800”.

It is unclear how many pre-bans are in the U.S. right now. According to a 1996 Institute of Justice Survey, 76 million rifles were possessed by U.S. civilians just two years into the Clinton ban.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s


  • CT Patriot

    Since when is some thing that isn't against the law, and hasn't been since 2001, a "loophole" in the law?

    This is just another opinion piece masquerading as a new story. The ONLY people who "feel" that there is a "loophole" are those who feel the law doesn't go far enough at disarming law abiding citizens. By running such an opinion piece and not publicly calling it as such, its apparent that FOX61 and Louisa Moller have once again decided to publicly take sides and advocate against the rights of all the citizens in the state of Connecticut based on their hoplophobic emotional fears.

  • Mike

    Why does this story surprise anyone ? There is no low Foxct61 or the Courant won't stoop to to sell papers or ratings. They sensationalize a mental case killer to inspire others so they can profit from more tradgedy. Foxct61 is the most liberal antigun media in Ct.

  • Skap

    Once factual reporting replaced by attempted sculpting of public opinion.

    If its a loophole, are you implying that the legislature jammed this these laws thru with out reading and understanding it’s implications?