‘Seclusion’ Is A Helpful Emergency Response For Some Students

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

“My son is very OCD, non-verbal autistic, understands everything you say,” says Jane Stango of Watertown, remembering how her son would bang his head against a faucet when he became extremely agitated at the River Street School in Windsor, a Capitol Region Education Council school for students with developmental disabilities. “Putting him in the ‘seclusion room’ there, which he was very comfortable with, allowed him to get rid of his OCD without hurting himself.” Stango believes “seclusion” can be effective for some children at specialized schools with highly trained professionals, but there is a new push to reduce use of this practice in schools, across the board.

“In all cases, it’s about ‘how do we prevent it.’ Nobody wants to seclude a child, nobody wants to restrain a child” says CREC’s Director of Student Services, Deborah Richards. “But when you have students who have such significant challenges, the question is: What interventions do we have to put into place to prevent that from happening?” Both “restraint” and “seclusion” are legal in Connecticut, as emergency responses when a student poses a risk to himself or others, or when “seclusion” is built into a parent-approved Individualized Education Plan. A recent state report shows the majority of children who experience “seclusions”, sometimes over an hour long, have autism, and related disorders. Many of these kids are young, in kindergarten or first grade. Parents, politicians and advocates expressed outrage and called for change at a recent forum in Hartford aimed at prevention of these techniques.

Watch Sarah’s interview with U.S. Sen. Chris Murphy.

“We always have someone either in the room processing with the student or someone watching the student every second they’re in some kind of isolation,” says Richards, explaining why CREC’s numbers, 3860 seclusions in the 2012-13 report, are high. She says they reflect precise, computerized tracking of students who could not succeed in their local classrooms. The overall numbers of restraint and seclusion, collected from about 250 schools, is “self-reported”. The accuracy of all data has been questioned by the state’s Child Advocate Sarah Eagan. “If it’s not as common at a public school, it’s not on everybody’s radar screen. So, I think you’ll see vast differences from school to school,” says Richards, noting that CREC’s psychologists and behavior analysts are highly trained for these extreme behavior interventions. “There are districts who clearly have that expertise but there are districts that don’t. ”

Stango was notified every time Chris, now 22 and living in a group home, was put in seclusion. She even witnessed his experience there and didn’t see a stark, scary image of a “scream room” but, rather, a padded space with a sensory wall. “Let’s face it, you have someone behind a door and it’s like they’re in a cage, but for him, it’s where he needed to be at that time,” she says. “It all depends on the school and the training. That’s it.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

1 Comment

  • sher

    Thank you for showing another side to this issue. We used a form of this.. not the rooms that keep being shown on tv.. but a Safe Sensory Room.. it was instrumental and much better than holds for our son (unless it’s an emergency) He would fight the staff in a Hold.. wouldn’t you? (I am sure there are mental scars from that too) Therefore escalating and creating more angst and behavior( he wanted out of that hold). . Vs.. being sent to a place where his adrenaline could be worked off .. and there was not a classroom audience. . (Respect his need for space) we created a sensory program/diet worked on communication. . Mostly he was frustrated with himself.. and how hard things were for him when he was younger.. PLEASE DO NOT TAKE THIS OPPORTUNITY FROM THESE KIDS/PARENTS/EDUCATORS.. it needs to be an individual decision and PLAN.. My son would not be where he is today without it.. talking,now desiring a place in our community where he can feel a place to belong.. just ask him… But that place will be the so called edge of the educational cliff.. marked age 21.. As there maybe no services for him.. now that he has come so far.. A real life Pandora’s box.. A very broken system.