What’s on your Fall #CTBucketList?

Court rules conversations between husband-wife in love triangle murder case not confidential

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

HARTFORD — The Connecticut Supreme Court has ruled in a love-triangle murder case that a state law protecting married couple’s conversations as confidential doesn’t apply to a convicted killer who protested the use of self-incriminating comments she made to her husband as evidence against her at trial.

Justices issued a 7-0 decision Thursday against Sheila Davalloo, who was convicted of murder for beating 32-year-old Anna-Lisa Raymundo and stabbing her nearly 20 times in her Stamford condominium in 2002.

Prosecutors said Davalloo killed Raymundo because she was in a sexual relationship with Raymundo’s boyfriend and wanted him to herself.

Davalloo’s husband testified that he lent her night-vision binoculars and eavesdropping devices. He said she had a lock-picking kit and practiced picking locks at home.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.